AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Exces de estrogen11/16/2023 John G, Schellong G (1980) Oestrogentherapie hochwüchsiger Mädchen. Hanker JP, Schellong G, Schneider HPG (1979) The functional state of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis after high-dose oestrogen therapy in excessively tall girls. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif Greulich WW, Pyle SI (1959) Radiographic atlas of skeletal development of the hand and wrist, 2nd edn. Greenblatt RB, McDonough PG, Maheshi VB (1966) Estrogen therapy in inhibition of growth. Goldzicher MA (1956) Treatment of excessive growth in the adolescent female. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 28: 416–419įreed SC (1978) Suppression of growth in excessively tall girls. Pediatrics 62:1189–1195įrasier SD, Smith FG (1968) Effect of estrogens on mature height in tall girls: A controlled study. Arch Dis Child 52:118–120Ĭrawford JD (1978) Treatment of tall girls with estrogen. Harri Deutsch Verlag, Frankfurt und ZürichĬolle ML, Alperin H, Greenblatt RB (1977) The tall girl. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 127: 551–556īucher H, Zachmann M, Prader A (1983) Personal communicationĬlauss G, Ebner H (1972) Grundlagen der Statistik für Psychologen, Pädagogen und Soziologen. J Pediatr 40:423–441īayley N, Gordan GS, Bayer LM, Goldberg MB, Storment A (1962) Attempt to suppress excessive growth in girls by estrogen treatment: Statistical evaluation. Acta Paediatr Scand 69: 293–297īayley N, Pinneau SR (1952) Tables for predicting adult height from skeletal age: Revised for use with the Greulich-Pyle hand standards. In the treated group highly significant correlations were found between height reduction and the initial chronologic age, bone age and duration of therapy.Īndersen A, Jacobsen BB, Kastrup KW, Krabbe S, Peitersen B, Petersen KE, Thampdrup E, Wichmann R (1980) Treatment of girls with excessive height prediction. The difference in the reduction of predicted height between the treated and untreated groups was significant ( P<0.05) only with the Bayley-Pinneau method and not with the others. In the untreated group the average differences between calculated and observed mature height varied from 0.2–3.4 cm. In the treated group there was an average reduction of predicted height of between 2.3 and 6.5 cm, depending on which of the four methods was used. Mean height predictions according to (1) Bayley-Pinneau, (2) Roche-Wainer-Thissen and Tanner (3) with, and (4) without allowance for midparent height ranged from 179.4–184 (I) to 175.7–179.5 cm (II). Recordings on initiation of the study were: Chronologic age: 12.0☑.4 (I) versus 13.5☑.5 years (II x), Bone age: (1) Greulich-Pyle: 11.8☑.4 (I) versus 13.1☑.1 years (II), (2) Tanner-Whitehouse II: 12.7☑.0 (I) versus 13.6☑.1 years (II). The untreated group is comparable but not a strict control group. Fourteen of them had been treated with high-dose oestrogens (I), while seven girls had not been treated (II). Twenty-one girls with familial tall stature were reevaluated at 18 years of age.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |